Leslie and I worked together on the “Zoom In” strategy using the same content and goals as I had used with Laura Laborde. However, I have streamlined the process, and I think it works a little better as listed here. In addition, I tried using the same image and “zooming in” on another part. The strategy seemed to flow better with the image this way.
Here is the updated version:
1. Introduce 3-2-1 Strategy and complete for “injustice”
2. Have students get out a piece of paper and put up the first Power Point slide for the image.
3. Write down notes for what you see in the image
5. Write down any questions you have about the image
7. Write down what you think the image means
9. Reveal the next part of the image
10. Write down new things you see in the image
12. Write down any new questions you have about the image
14. Look back at what you think the image “meant” the first time and revise where your thinking has changed
16. Complete the process until the entire image is revealed
17. Discuss how students thinking about the image changed throughout the process. Consider how these skills will translate to texts:
- Looking closely and carefully at texts- individual words, phrases, sentences.
- Looking at chunks of the text and forming a flexible hypothesis as one is reading.
- Stopping to ask meaningful questions and seeking to answer them as one is reading.
A couple of notes about this. I am learning that the 3-2-1 strategy is a difficult concept for students to grasp and needs to be explicitly taught, discussed and practiced to be effective as a measurement of students thinking. I think this is ok, but time is needed the first time it is introduced in order for students to understand the concept and expectations. I would be interested to see how it works once students have had this experience.
Here is the Power Point I used with Harris: Zoom for Leslie Harris
After I left Laura’s classroom, she did some really interesting work on her own. First of all, she had students reflect on the experience in a number of ways and shared these reflections with me. Here is a picture of the discussion guide she gave to students:
The responses she received showed students making many connections from the activity to working with texts. For example, students said such text-based skills might be “interpreting” what is not directly explained by an author, “hypothesizing” about what will happen in the future of a text, and looking for “context clues” in texts to determine meaning.
Students also identified that as they continued to look closer and for longer in the activity, they were able to think of the “deeper meaning,” look more “critically” and “wonder” about more things. In addition, one student said that when he doesn’t understand something he would “ask meaningful questions” about it to help him understand.
Laura followed this reflection by reading the back cover of Of Mice and Men with students and discussing what they might hypothesize the book will be about. Students made connections to Naturalism and the book cover to make predictions.
Laura plans to continue to build on this activity through examining foreshadowing in the text and predicting future events with students as they read.